TL:DR?
What's Dominating: Reform UK targets half a million people with anxiety disorders for benefit cuts.
The Narrative Split: Progressive opportunity: Young people are anxious because the economy broke its promise to them vs Populist exploitation: "Soft generation needs alarm clocks not handouts - we've labeled them disabled for political correctness"
Why Today Matters: When all three major parties compete to cut disability support, the window for defending social safety nets is closing fast - and the people who'll suffer most have the least power to fight back
Reform's PIP Cut Proposal: Punishing Anxiety Instead of Addressing Its Causes
What Actually Happened
Reform UK announced plans to remove people with anxiety disorders from PIP eligibility, claiming it would save £9bn by 2029. The policy would affect approximately 500,000 people currently claiming PIP for anxiety. Lee Anderson admitted he previously "gamed the system" when working at Citizens Advice Bureau to help people qualify for benefits. The party proposes mandatory face-to-face assessments and a £500m "Fast Track to Work" program with talking therapy. Those affected would lose benefits, with only 10-20% expected to be re-categorized into other support.
Key context: Labour, Conservatives, and Reform are all proposing welfare cuts targeting similar groups, creating cross-party consensus on cuts without consensus on solutions.
How It's Being Twisted
Right populists: "Finally someone brave enough to say it - the 'anxiety generation' needs an alarm clock, not a handout. Anderson knows the system is rigged because he rigged it himself. Young Brits are staying home while foreign workers do the jobs."
Left populists: "Another attack on working-class mental health by millionaires who've never struggled. They're calling anxiety 'not serious' while trauma from poverty, housing crisis, and job insecurity destroys young lives. Westminster elites - Labour, Tories, Reform - all united against ordinary disabled people."
Pushback Options
If calling out the contradiction: "Anderson admits he helped people 'game the system' - so Reform's solution is to punish the people he helped, not fix the assessments he admits he manipulated? That's scapegoating, not reform."
If exposing the root cause dodge: "Reform blames anxious young people but won't address why they're anxious. No policy on unaffordable housing. No policy on wage stagnation. No policy on job insecurity. Just cut the support for people struggling with the problems Reform won't fix."
If demanding economic honesty: "Young people aren't lazy - they work multiple jobs and still can't afford what one wage bought their parents' generation. Maybe the problem isn't their work ethic, it's an economy that broke its promise."
What They're Really Feeling:
Genuine frustration that their taxes seem to support people they see not trying while they struggle on low wages. Fear that the system rewards "giving up" while punishing resilience. Anger that working full-time can leave you worse off than benefits. Nostalgia for when "people just got on with it.
But Reform never asks:
Why aren't wages keeping pace with living costs? (Might anger their business donors who profit from low wages)
Why is housing so unaffordable? (Might require building social housing or challenging landlords - including Reform MPs who are landlords)
Why are mental health services so underfunded? (Might require spending money, not cutting it)
The Winner: Anderson's "alarm clock generation vs anxiety generation" framing
The Angle: Let's actually compare the generations
The Execution:
Split-screen comparison video:
LEFT: "ALARM CLOCK GENERATION" (1970s)
House = 3x salary
One wage, buy house, support family
Union job, sick pay, pension
Retire at 60
RIGHT: "ANXIETY GENERATION" (NOW)
House = 9x salary
Two jobs, can't afford rent
Zero-hour contract, no rights
Retire at 68+
Text overlay: "One generation went to work and bought a future. The other works harder and can't afford rent. Maybe the anxiety is the rational response."
End card: "Reform blames young people for being anxious. Won't address why they're anxious. Their MPs are landlords profiting from unaffordable housing. Connect the dots."
Why This Works: It reframes "soft generation" as "squeezed generation." Shows young people aren't lazy - the deal got worse. The economic contrast is stark and undeniable.
For PIP Reform:
"Reform should mean better assessment, not blanket bans that punish genuine disability"
"Fix what's making young people sick instead of cutting support when they are"
"Anderson gamed the system, now wants to punish people for it - try fixing the assessments instead"
For the "Work Ethic" Narrative:
"Young people work harder for less than any generation - three jobs to rent a room isn't lazy"
"When one wage bought a house, 'get up at 5am' made sense. Now it barely covers rent."
Complexity Made Simple:
Don't say: "PIP provides non-means-tested additional cost compensation for functional impairment"
Do say: "PIP helps disabled people afford extra costs"
Don't say: "Intergenerational socioeconomic mobility has declined precipitously"
Do say: "Young people are the first generation poorer than their parents - no wonder they're anxious"
Tomorrow: Expect more Reform welfare announcements and "undeserving claimant" stories in media. Counter with human stories of PIP helping people work and live independently.
This newsletter is produced using AI - specifically Claude’s Opus 4.0 Model.
It is designed to offer insight and spark ideas but not everything will align with your values and strategy - take what works for you and leave the rest.
It may contain errors - if you’re going big on something here then do double check it!
We are always trying to improve the content by adding evidence about narratives and messaging that work.
We also believe strongly that tackling populism in a way which also strengthens democracy and social cohesion requires a willingness to listen to and engage with people who see the world very differently to us.
Rootcause offers a suite of similar subject specific newsletters drawn from a range of new media sources which are personalised for our clients needs. If you’d like to know more then please get in touch.
Feedback is always welcome: [email protected]